# Help make one international credentialing workflow measurably better.

> Evaluate a narrow, consent-led international credentialing workflow with Medhub.

Canonical: https://medhub.one/institutions
Last updated: 2026-08-08

Design partner pilot

We are looking for credentialing teams willing to evaluate a narrow Germany-bound case dossier, not buy a fictional enterprise platform.

[Discuss the pilot ](mailto:contact@medhub.one?subject=Institutional design partner pilot)[Review our boundaries](https://medhub.one/trust)

[For hospitalsHospital shortage pilotScope one role, one jurisdiction, and one accountable review loop.Explore the path ](https://medhub.one/institutions/hospital-shortage)[For universities and IMG teamsUniversity and IMG pilotTest a clearer pathway map against real questions from a defined cohort.Explore the path ](https://medhub.one/institutions/university-img)

## One pathway

Internationally trained physicians or nurses targeting Germany, with scope agreed before the pilot.

## One dossier

A consented case summary, requirement status and evidence index for review, not an automated approval.

## One feedback loop

Measure missing information, review touches and time spent, then decide whether the workflow earns expansion.

## A credible pilot ends with evidence.

Named accountable reviewer

Explicit professional consent

Document and data boundary agreed

Baseline and outcome metrics recorded

No implied credential verification

No production claim before live use